Talk:UN criticises Israel's latest settlement plan, angry reaction from US and UK

The article stub says US Secretary General, not UN Secretary General.

Review of revision 913565 [Passed]

Revision 913565 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 913565 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Slightly misleading

At first glance, I thought the title meant that the US and UK were angry at the UN for the criticism, rather than adding to criticism of Israel. A minor change of wording could work, possibly "UN, US, UK ...", though that would be a bit strange --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 07:43, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I clicked on this talk page to make the exact same comment. 66.152.245.18 (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Why are the US and UK angry at the UN?

Why are the US and UK angry at the UN? This is not true.