Talk:UK firm gets ESA funding to ground test new jet engine for spaceplane

Review 1

Revision 769698 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Almost every paragraph is a run on sentence. Please see WN:SG. Comments by reviewer: Aside from the run-on sentences, the article is pretty much good to go. Just needs some good c/e --DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 769698 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Almost every paragraph is a run on sentence. Please see WN:SG. Comments by reviewer: Aside from the run-on sentences, the article is pretty much good to go. Just needs some good c/e --DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review revision 770290

Revision 770290 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: --SVTCobra 02:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 770290 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: --SVTCobra 02:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.