Talk:UK electoral commission asked to investigate News International payoffs
Review of revision 1277562 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1277562 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 08:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Far too much close paraphrasing from the Irish Times story. The Irish Times source reports that it was £275,000 not $275,000. They aren't the same thing. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1277562 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 08:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Far too much close paraphrasing from the Irish Times story. The Irish Times source reports that it was £275,000 not $275,000. They aren't the same thing. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
If it helps, try using {{Money}} to give values in both GBP and USD (I'd also recommend including EUR). It helps our readers if we include more than one currency, and the template does all the formatting and linking for them. That would be {{Money|GBP|275|USD|<value>|EUR|<value>|units=thousands}}
. ;) DENDODGE 23:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Headline
editA headline should be a sentence; this one is a noun clause. "X calls for Y" is a sentence; "Call for Y" is a noun clause.
Also, I don't know who calls for Y; this basic question appears not to be answered by the lede. --Pi zero (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1278044 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1278044 of this article has been reviewed by Ragettho (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1278044 of this article has been reviewed by Ragettho (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |