Talk:Turing test beaten by Russian chatterbot

Review of revision 2677340 [Passed]

Revision 2677340 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: In establishing a suitably succinct lede I did take pains (as usual for a reviewer) to make only minimal changes; perhaps this would have been clearer if I'd divided the edit into two so that each half could be observed as a separate diff. Passages were reordered with strictly minimal adjustment of words for flow. See detailed history of edits during review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2677340 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: In establishing a suitably succinct lede I did take pains (as usual for a reviewer) to make only minimal changes; perhaps this would have been clearer if I'd divided the edit into two so that each half could be observed as a separate diff. Passages were reordered with strictly minimal adjustment of words for flow. See detailed history of edits during review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

NPOV

I hate having to tag my own article, but apparently we shouldn't recognize Kevin Warwick like that. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

ViperSnake151 — Since that comment was made, I submitted for review this edit, which was reviewed and published by another reviewer. Does that suffice, do you think? Is there a need to change the headline? If so, we should change it promptly, before the 24-hours-after-publication horizon. I hadn't felt the headline needed changing since the sense in which it's true is clarified (now) in the first sentence of the lede. --Pi zero (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Typo and interwiki

"Yesterday, the Russia]]n" -> maybe, "Yesterday, the [[Russia]]n" ?

Also, please, add the interwiki ru:Тест Тьюринга пройден. Thanks. --Brateevsky (talk) 12:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Done —Mikemoral♪♫ 12:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC)