Talk:Telegram introduces blogging and instant view features

Review of revision 4265249 [Passed]

Revision 4265249 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4265249 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Size of image

@Blood Red Sandman: When the news article is shared on Facebook, if the image is lesser than 250 (or probably 260) px, the image is not (what we say; visible or appears) on the post. That is why, I kept the width of the image as 300px. Also, the page needs to be protected against renaming allowing only the administrators to do so.
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 11:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Curiously, that didn't ping me. It should have done. Odd.

The image could possibly stand to get bigger now I've discovered, and a removed, a {{clear}} which was creating piles of whitespace. I'll play around with different sizes and see what I can come up with. With that said, we cannot adjust our articles to do what Facebook wants. We are our own site.

I'm not the strongest proponent on protection against renaming, but fair enough. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 11:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Brian McNeil once pointed out, and since then, we have kept image size at least 260px wide.
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 11:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

I'm all for that, where it works. Where it doesn't... Well, we can't go around purposely messing up our formatting for Facebook's benefit. As it happens, I'm trying to decide how big I can get away with making images on my feature piece; the bigger the better, but after a point they get absurd. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 11:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)