Talk:Several injured in suicide bomb blast near police lane, Islamabad

I donot think it cause copyrights problemsregarding this article, check back again, and then publish it, whereas Style Issue, can u suggest me , what u feel wrong in it's style? Azamishaque (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The article needs work and is not ready for publishing. Fixing it up a bit. --Poisonous (talk) 08:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I donot understand what more you are expecting in it? All the facts and figures are pointed out,with all the refrences, Might be you are talking about some grammer mistake!! Help in this else it is ready to publish or make it correct and then Publish it will honour your suggestions Azamishaque (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have explained. The grammar was a bit bad and it had some information in there that was not needed, while other information was not included. There was a slight NPOV problem, and unneeded sources. I fixed them and it's awaiting a review. :) --Poisonous (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision 707719 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: fail "The attack happened as intelligence and military chiefs were briefing lawmakers on the campaign against Islamist extremists " is copyvio of this Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: not checked due to other problems NPOV: Not ready: not checked due to other problems Style: Not ready: not checked due to other problems Comments by reviewer: Exept for copyvio issues, a good article Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 707719 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: fail "The attack happened as intelligence and military chiefs were briefing lawmakers on the campaign against Islamist extremists " is copyvio of this Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: not checked due to other problems NPOV: Not ready: not checked due to other problems Style: Not ready: not checked due to other problems Comments by reviewer: Exept for copyvio issues, a good article Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Ok i m waiting too Azamishaque (talk) 04:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Ehm, I double checked, I used Find, could not find that in the article... --Poisonous (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

What are you looking for? what you want to find? Azamishaque (talk) 10:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I went and saw that the copyvio sentence wasn't even in there, I believe I had changed it a while ago when I first edited it, I strangled Anon a bit so there :P --Poisonous (talk) 18:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Review 2

I'm not filling in the whole template as I have found a copyright issue:

"said the bomber had parked the vehicle outside the three-storey ATC building and walked inside and gave a box of sweets to Muharar Tahir, who was stated to be his friend." - copyvio of http://www.dawn.com/2008/10/10/top2.htm

Review 3

Revision 708411 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: not a copyvio The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 708411 of this article has been reviewed by Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: not a copyvio The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.