Talk:Seven dead, one missing, two survive French helicopter crash off Gabon coast

I CREATED this copter tragedy article. Please help in publishing it. Cheers.--Florentino Floro (talk) 06:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Reuters said the chopper was[1] an AS 532 Cougar.--Florentino Floro (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

7 dead now, so I did change the title

I added this minor thing - with UN peacekeepers at Bouna airport, in the Ivory Coast. [2]--Florentino Floro (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)--Florentino Floro (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I added category:Nicolas Sarkozy but i'm not sure if he is mentioned enough to warrent it. I also removed Central African Republic infobox and cat as it did not seem to have anything to do with article. Bawolff ☺☻ 09:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Updated

I found the latest news which clarified the matter adding Xinhua dn RFI:“This type of helicopter does not have a black box. So the flight was not recorded, nor were the voices in the cockpit. So some elements will remain unknown.” joint investigation was being conducted by French gendarmes and an air accident expert. -six commandos from the French army's elite 13th Regiment of Dragon Paratroopers. -The commandos were part of the 600 French and Gabonese troops maneuvering in the military drill known as Baptise Ngeri. Thanks for the review (I just corrected the template spelling since it appeared red and placed it down to appear on front page after your sight. Cheers.--Florentino Floro (talk) 10:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 754042 of this article has been reviewed by iDangerMouse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Pretty good. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 754042 of this article has been reviewed by iDangerMouse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Pretty good. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.