Talk:Russian police say Moscow airport bomber identified
- Rev #1171009 fact checked, bar hardly-need-to-source The nation's transport infrastructure will deal with extra visitors. The phrase killer of 35 confused me, I assumed that the bomber was 35 years old until I read the next clause. — μ 16:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- while local TV has shown CCTV footage of the explosion is also unsourced, as far as I can tell. — μ 16:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think it is, lemme look. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1171028 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1171028 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
killer of 35 reads weirdly, but other than that I'd have passed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1171028 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
killer of 35 reads weirdly, but other than that I'd have passed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Disagree. AFP: "Footage of the explosion has been captured by a closed-circuit camera and replayed on Russian television." Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1171035 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1171035 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Turns out it was in the AFP article The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1171035 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Turns out it was in the AFP article The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |