Talk:Relics of 39 saints found by British Museum
 |
Revision 792609 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 04:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 792609 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 04:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
"John the Baptist, James, John, and Mary Magdalen, and 35 others" is 39. "However, only 39 bundles were found, indicating that . . . one had been lost." 39 - 1 != 39. According to the Irish Times article (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2009/0324/1224243318094.html) there were 40 names. It should read "and 36 others", no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.136.225 (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks for pointing that out. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 02:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
