Talk:Release and pardon of killer jeopardises Armenia-Azerbaijan ceasefire

Source question

This article is ONE PARAGRAPH. It needs to be three to be publishable. Are all six of those sources really used to verify that one paragraph? If not, they need to be removed in order to ease verifiability. Source overload makes source reviewing difficult. (Says she who is currently doing that with sport articles.) --LauraHale (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

• I concur. I went eep! when I saw the number of sources, but am hoping they are going to be used to dramatically expand the article into a more-comprehensive, and informative, report. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1611530 [Not ready]

Revision 1611530 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: see comments Comments by reviewer: This is a first for me: Everything in this article makes sense, except for the lede sentence. This is for international readers, and such readers shouldn't be left scratching their heads, after having read the article's first 22 words (quite the opposite, really). Try answering this question quickly: "Why would Armenia see this act as filled with contempt and impunity?" --the answer should form the bedrock for the lede. I enjoyed reading it (as disturbing as it is). The wording needs to readily make sense to a school teacher in Manila or a truck driver in Illinois. --Bddpaux (talk) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1611530 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: see comments Comments by reviewer: This is a first for me: Everything in this article makes sense, except for the lede sentence. This is for international readers, and such readers shouldn't be left scratching their heads, after having read the article's first 22 words (quite the opposite, really). Try answering this question quickly: "Why would Armenia see this act as filled with contempt and impunity?" --the answer should form the bedrock for the lede. I enjoyed reading it (as disturbing as it is). The wording needs to readily make sense to a school teacher in Manila or a truck driver in Illinois. --Bddpaux (talk) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Expanded the paragraph on the history between the two, can't really do this in the lede without unbalancing it, however I don't think even the participants in this could explain their fear and hatred of each other in a way that a rational person could understand.--KTo288 (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1612605 [Passed]

Revision 1612605 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Articles like this can be particularly difficult to review; largely because sourcing decent-quality background information is quite challenging. I've worked on the basis that a lot of the background is a rewritten distillation of the Wikipedia article. But, it has to be stressed Wikipedia is not a reliable source. I've checked the broad strokes of the summary against a couple of the references from Wikipedia, added one as a visible source, and another in an HTML comment. This might be a good way to deal with such in future. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1612605 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Articles like this can be particularly difficult to review; largely because sourcing decent-quality background information is quite challenging. I've worked on the basis that a lot of the background is a rewritten distillation of the Wikipedia article. But, it has to be stressed Wikipedia is not a reliable source. I've checked the broad strokes of the summary against a couple of the references from Wikipedia, added one as a visible source, and another in an HTML comment. This might be a good way to deal with such in future. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.