Talk:RU486 debate complicates with amendments posed in Australian House of Representatives

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Divol in topic see also to add if it's permited ?!

Original reporting edit

This article contains original reporting based on official transcripts of parliament (Hansards). Dysprosia 12:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

vies? edit

I don't understand this sentecne: "noting his vies that the TGA process is" - is it supposed to say "ties"? - Borofkin 23:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

views! My internets was screwing up yesterday so couldn't really fix that. Sorry :) Dysprosia 00:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Need an admin to fix edit

There's a typo that has got itself into the archived version and needs to be fixed: (Liberal, Bowman) needs to have the link on Bowman to go to w:Division of Bowman, not w:Divison of Lindsay. Dysprosia 08:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. --Deprifry|+T+ 09:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

see also to add if it's permited ?! edit

I'ld like to add this see also as link, RU486 Abortion pill hearings begin in Australia

i think it's important to link related articles, and as it's do not change content of the article !! Jacques Divol 14:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Return to "RU486 debate complicates with amendments posed in Australian House of Representatives" page.