Talk:ROV detects leaks in Deepwater Horizon well cap

OR

I emailed the BP press office again, and if they are as nice to me as they were last time, hopefully I will get a response. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 10:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

• The YouTube video I linked to in the article was uploaded by me because I was watching the feed when this happened. It is best viewed in full screen. Bubbles or oil are seen at the left of this pipe just after the elbow. The second can be seen just through the hole of the large metal ring. The third is the most visible and appears to be the worst of them and is located in plain sight just to the right of the large metal ring. This was live when I saw it. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 10:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

• At the time of this posting Live feeds from Hos – ROV 1 is the current live feed of the leaks in question. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 10:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

• just watched press conference on TV...not a lot to go on though. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 21:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Phone call

My scanner won't scan for whatever reason so below are the notes I took when I talk to the BP rep:

BP call notes

Texas PR office

(281) 368-4463

"small leak"

metal flange

hydrates being released = gases + oil

pipe is made of stainless steel

"studying the issue"

will do something if becomes a problem

—Mikemoral♪♫ 21:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1062403 [Passed]

Revision 1062403 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1062403 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 1062403 [Passed]

Revision 1062403 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1062403 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Nice article

Well done to all involved, makes a good read :). Sean Heron (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)