Talk:Prospects for a space elevator rise
Review of revision 910547 [Passed]
edit
Revision 910547 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 910547 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Headline
editThe headline is a subjective assessment by the contributor, and not in accordance with WP:V. The factual piece of news is that the competition was won. Whether or not the competition was framed in a way that "raise prospects for a space elevator" is a separate question, not answered by the sources. --87.53.12.76 (talk) 07:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm curious. Perhaps you could explain the relelvence of w:WP:V? As the last time I looked, Wikinews has not voted to allow wholesale importing of Wikipedia policies. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 07:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)