Talk:Prosecutors begin NY State Sen. Hiram Monserrate felony assault case

Review of revision 885386 [Passed]

Revision 885386 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good article. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 885386 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good article. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Title

• The original title on this was appallingly long and should have been shortened prior to review and publication. Now, my only gripe is that "felony" is a particularly US-centric term, it is then norm for an assault (a civil proceeding would be the unusual enough case to highlight that legal aspect), and as such is really just a "noise" word in the current title. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 01:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: It was moved, by myself, prior to review. Cirt (talk) 01:06, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

And "felony" is key here - if convicted of a felony, the politician would be forced to resign from his post. Any lesser conviction, and that would not be the case. Cirt (talk) 01:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)