Talk:Poll of 100 million votes names new Seven Wonders of the World

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Daniel

This really needs the following things:-

  • a little bit of background about the ancient variety of Wonders, possibly including the fact that the pyramids are the only thing left from that group.
  • how they were selected - voting procedures, voting dates, etc. - the article makes no real mention of this 'online poll'.
  • how the initial list was chosen.
  • a clarification about the "Voting doubled after the June results" - what June results?
  • some interwiki links for places and people involved.
  • some more sources; one is not enough.
  • a more clarified caption (it's only one of the Wonders, not all)
  • a general copyedit to make the giant blob of text that is the opening paragraph more readable.
  • reword the first sentence to remove the badly-formatted dates (Wikinews doesn't use th etc.).

I have depublished the article for the time being. Daniel 01:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is much better thanks to Wpktsfs's total rewrite. I feel it is good enough to publish, and have done so. Cheers, Daniel 07:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Poll of 100 million votes names new Seven Wonders of the World" page.