Talk:Pilgrims killed in Indian temple stampede
- This is profoundly sad, but to step back from that for a moment: look at the first source article...."chock-a-block" is an interesting colloquialism, isn't it? It's certainly not American English, but one gets the gist quite quickly with a term like that!! --Bddpaux (talk) 02:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Review of revision 2054692 [Passed]
edit  |
Revision 2054692 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: One of those funny situations, source-wise: there's alot of information, but there ACTUALLY ISN'T a whole lot of information, because this story is still kind of breaking. Considering that, I gave you a bit of leeway on source similarities. Probably should've been a bit meaner about that, but it's a good article, and you seem to've worked hard to avoid direct cut-and-paste. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 2054692 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: One of those funny situations, source-wise: there's alot of information, but there ACTUALLY ISN'T a whole lot of information, because this story is still kind of breaking. Considering that, I gave you a bit of leeway on source similarities. Probably should've been a bit meaner about that, but it's a good article, and you seem to've worked hard to avoid direct cut-and-paste. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |