Talk:Philippines Supreme Court to probe leak of draft judgment in election case

I CREATED this landmark legal news article which rocked our Philippine judiciary. Please help in developing and reviewing this for publication. Thanks.--Florentino Floro (talk) 10:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Sources

Are all those sources really necessary? Please get rid of all but the ones you got information directly from. I don't think anyone has the time to go through all that. I'd be happy to review once the sources are thinned out. --Poisonous (talk) 04:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I had cut the sources of duplicates. Sorry, for the bad style. I am just nervous, of again being found copyright vio vis-a-vis good style of writing. I had really put so many redundant sources. Thanks for making Wikinews better (I had a slight cold-fever, yesterday; I am not submitting this as alibi, sorry again). Merry X'mas. --Florentino Floro (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

It's fine, I do that sometimes too. --Poisonous (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision 743662 of this article has been reviewed by Poisonous (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:14, 21 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 743662 of this article has been reviewed by Poisonous (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:14, 21 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.