Talk:Pakistani army seizes Taliban stronghold after week-long battle

Review of revision 902331 [Passed]

Revision 902331 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to go. Nice work. -Tempodivalse [talk] 23:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 902331 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to go. Nice work. -Tempodivalse [talk] 23:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Should have failed review

This should have failed review, or been worked over somewhat prior to publication. It has POV issues, spelling errors, improperly cited sources, and quite a few other issues. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 00:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

There was one slight POV issue that I missed, which i now toned down. But I don't see any spelling errors. or any of the other issues you described? Maybe i'm missing something. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Forgive me if I'm out of touch, but aren't edits like these supposed to happen before the publish? - Amgine | ^t 00:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, as should this edit. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 00:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

And this one - although the categories are not that critical. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 00:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I completely forgot about the categories - I always forget to check them when reviewing. The other issues I didn't notice until after reviewing the article, my bad. (Self-note: don't review articles when you're tired.) Tempodivalse [talk] 00:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I personally apologize for the mistakes, I have not been in the best of conditions lately. I will take much better care in reviewing my writing before asking for a review. Marx01 ^{Tell me about it} 00:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)