Talk:Pakistani Punjab police website hacked

Review of revision 1057520 [Failed]

Revision 1057520 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I don't see the previous incidents in any of the provided sources, nor the statement by the police spokesman NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1057520 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I don't see the previous incidents in any of the provided sources, nor the statement by the police spokesman NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1057762 [Passed]

Revision 1057762 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This article stepped over the copyright vio line. I changed a few things, but just enough to back it up over the Red Line In The Sand. Please do not slightly reword sentences and then think that you're not violating copyright. Also, I removed one sentence that wasn't sourced. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1057762 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This article stepped over the copyright vio line. I changed a few things, but just enough to back it up over the Red Line In The Sand. Please do not slightly reword sentences and then think that you're not violating copyright. Also, I removed one sentence that wasn't sourced. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.