Talk:Pacific Rim braces for tsunami following major Chilean earthquake
Review of revision 966357 [Passed]
edit  |
Revision 966357 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Please be consistent with time formats. Where a separator is appropriate, please use a colon. Ideally this article should be updated to have equivalent UTC times throughout, making following the wave easier. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 966357 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Please be consistent with time formats. Where a separator is appropriate, please use a colon. Ideally this article should be updated to have equivalent UTC times throughout, making following the wave easier. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Tsunami warnings largely passed: please update
editThetsunami has passed through most of the Pacific and Tsunami advisoriesand alerts have been lifted for the Western US and Kamchatka:
- http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/2010/02/27/725245/25/message725245-25.htm
- http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61R0RO20100228
I believe such warnings have been lifted for Australia as well. About theonly areas still on alert as of this writing is Japan (where smalltsunami surges have been hitting over the last hour or so), and China.76.126.177.9 (talk) 08:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I just took breaking off the story, a followup piece should really be written. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)