Talk:Officials in Mexico claim leaked Dirty War report isn't final copy

Sources

I am concerned that this is another in a string of allegation stories. The story is alleging things from a leaked report that hasnt been officially released and that we dont have access to. Its a he said / she said and I am not certain about its authenticity. Although you have both sides of the story and then would alleviate any NPOV problems, I just simply don't believe that its complete or a 2d lead story. Get a copy of the report, rewrite the slug (opening line) and make it sing. I really had to read it 3 times before understanding it. -Drew 20:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the whole point of the report is, as I understand it, to determine if a 'dirty war' took place. The term itself is very generic, yet the article refers to 'the dirty war'. Very confusing story that needs background.24.94.246.41 20:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand your concerns. The report was linked, that's a fact. And the administration claims that the leaked copy is not the real report, that's a fact. Is the title confusing? --MateoP 20:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes --Cspurrier 20:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I have no idea what the war is. Where the term comes from or anything about this article. -Drew 20:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)