Wikinews talk:Briefs/June 20, 2009

Review

Revision 837893 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: published into recording date The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 837893 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: published into recording date The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

--Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Please add CAT:Wimbledon Championships and link it at the first instance

{{editprotected}}
acagastya 05:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

We don't categorize briefs by topic. As for linking... well, I see no reason not too, but since this evidently doesn't already link keywords in the body, that'll be a significant operation. --Pi zero (talk) 11:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@Pi zero: There are many like this one. Wikinews_Shorts:_April_2,_2007.
acagastya 13:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Briefs are different from shorts. Shorts are news items, like ordinary articles but shorter. Briefs are summaries of other articles that we've published. As I understand it, briefs are not categorized by topic because if one wanted to know what we have about a topic, one would want to see our article, rather than a summary of our article. --Pi zero (talk)

Not done --SVTCobra 22:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)