Talk:New video shows 9/11 hijackers attending Al-Qaeda camp in Afghanistan

Terrorist

One...it is a terrorist camp per sources. The word terrorist can be sourced in all sources. In this case Terrorist is NOT used as a POV but used as a fact to describe these 2 terrorists. Jason Safoutin 21:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply Jason, but I had other issues to focus on. As for the word "terrorist", Wiktionary itself clarifies that

Quote

---

he use of the label "terrorist" is often controversial or subjective, since one person's terrorist may be another's freedom fighter, and vice versa.

. So you see, even though you and your fellow Americans may consider Al-Qaeda "terrorists", to many other people the mujahideen of the Al-Qaeda are warriors fighting for a noble cause. Hence, we will not use the word "terrorist". PVJ^(Talk)_{(Articles I have written)} 02:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Then tell me what were the highjackers and where did they train? Are they lovable bunnies who trained at Disney Land? I am sorry but these were terrorists at a terror camp. The camp is NOT necessairly Al-Qaeda and therefore IMO is misleading. Jason Safoutin 20:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

To you, they were "terrorists", to others they were matyrs. "Terrorist" is not NPOV. PVJ^(Talk)_{(Articles I have written)} 01:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Imo religion is a POV...thus until you can provide a reason as to why they are not terrorists and a SOURCE that says they are not then I will be happy. But the reason you do not want the word is coz of a "Belief" which ois not a FACT and is a POV. Provide proof that they are matyrs. Jason Safoutin 17:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Spelling

"Highjackers" should be "Hijackers". --wikitravel:User:Evan

Done. FellowWikiNews (W) 20:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Please add this article to Category:9/11. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 15:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Done --Jcart1534 05:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)