Talk:New York Times to start charging for access to web news

Active discussions

Review of revision 1196926 [Passed]Edit

SIX sources?Edit

Why does such a short article require six sources? --Brian McNeil / talk 16:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

More than necessary doesn't hurt. Plus, it's kind of interesting to see other companies' spin on the issue. --SweetNightmares (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
It does hurt. The policy is WN:CS - which also goes on to explain the issue. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
This is the version I requested for publication: I don't know where the others came from, but they are not necessary for sourcing, IMO. I will remove them. Mattisse (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you. People forget this isn't Wikipedia, and the whole point isn't to act as a link agregator. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Return to "New York Times to start charging for access to web news" page.