Talk:Natural sciences

This talk page has been submitted for speedy deletion according to the Criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given was: No parent article If you think this deletion is unwarranted, or have fixed the problem outlined above, please leave a note below.

This talk page has been submitted for speedy deletion according to the Criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given was: No parent article If you think this deletion is unwarranted, or have fixed the problem outlined above, please leave a note below.

Removing review request

I am removing the request to review this article. Requests for review are only appropriate once an article is written. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 18:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

I think a deletion should work because no identified news sources, thoughts? Thanks. BigKrow (talk) 19:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

@Michael.C.Wright BigKrow (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes. It certainly meets the no content, no sources, and very short, requirements of a speedy deletion. MathXplore has marked it for deletion as out of scope. I was giving the author the benefit of the doubt. I didn't see any harm in the article hanging around for a bit as "being developed" but it shouldn't waste reviewers' time in the queue. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 13:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC); edited Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 14:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)