Talk:Morning-after pill to be made available to 17-year-olds, U.S. federal judge rules

Woman vs. Girls

I may be wrong, but woman is for 18+. Girls for 17-. Will check AP style guide though. One moment please ... —Calebrw (talk) 03:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Youth might be the best way to. AP says 13 through 18. Girl is any human female until the 18th birthday is reached, so that would work too. —Calebrw (talk) 03:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I guess I'll change it to "girls" for when it refers to 17 year olds then. --Resplendent (talk) 03:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Title

I might be the only one thinking this. But what is Plan B? Yes I figured it out when I read the first line of the article. I am not saying it needs to be changed as well, it draws the reader in in a sense...Any ideas? DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 05:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree - first thing I was thinking of was definitly not birth control. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Suggestions for a more clear title are welcome! "Judge rules against FDA in morning-after pill lawsuit"? --Resplendent (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That title sounds too formal. I would say "Morning-after pill to be made available to 17-year-olds, judge rules". That works a bit better, the way you have implies that there would be some context for the headline in which WN readers already knew about the lawsuit. For instance, a few days ago, with the New Jersey proposed ban on Bikini Waxing, the second story's title could have been changed a bit. —Calebrw (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Birth control > morning after pill was actually the first thing I thought of. I guess I've just seen or heard about it on the news fairly recently. —Calebrw (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Title still doesn't work. I had to work out why this was news, since sex is legal at sixteen in my country. You should at least specify US. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Peer review

Revision 791491 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I think it's good enough now to be published. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 791491 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I think it's good enough now to be published. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.