Talk:More than 300 arrested in over two days after US drug operation

Review of revision 901678 [Passed]

Revision 901678 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 901678 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Title

Is this the as-given VOA title? More than 300 arrested in over two days after US drug operation. It's painfully awkward. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 00:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

My thought precisely - but I'm reluctant to move a published article. (the first thing I would drop is the "over" two days - either its two days, or three ( or more) days). And probably either "two days" or "in/after US drug operation" would be fine, rather than both. Sean Heron (talk) 20:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)