Talk:Mexican therapy increases survival of cervical cancer patients
 |
Revision 836793 of this article has been reviewed by Dottydotdot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Interesting The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 836793 of this article has been reviewed by Dottydotdot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Interesting The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Rearrange
edithi Dottydotdot, and thanks for taking the time to review the article! about the rearrangement you made on the first parragraph, doesnt it imply that the patients were at the National Oncology Institute? from what i understood, the team did some research there and then went around the world for the trials. Revoluc (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Aha, yep I see your point, I've changed it a bit, what do you think? Dotty••|☎ 16:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- nice :D
- i keep taking the style guide too seriously and ending up with those messy long sentences, so i need ppl like you to keep me on the right track xD Revoluc (talk) 00:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Image
editi put the image of the dna back up, since the text explains the mechanism of the therapy the article is about. if an image of a strand of genetic material is indeed irrelevant in an article about a disease that originates in the genetic material, then perhaps it could be changed to an image of the gemcitabine molecule. Revoluc (talk) 04:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
