Talk:Madagascar's leader Andry Rajoelina 'will not run in polls'

Review of revision 1018532 [Passed]

Revision 1018532 of this article has been reviewed by James Pain (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:33, 13 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'm happy with that, good work. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1018532 of this article has been reviewed by James Pain (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:33, 13 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'm happy with that, good work. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Ok for not changing the photo - even though the actual one is of very bad quality - but the NPOV here is not respected, and if articles reflect the specific time at which they were written and published, what is reflected here is Wikipedia's stand towards the political conflict that took place at this time.

..!.. Thistrackted, t, 5/22/2012 11:15a

Picture

{{editprotected}}

The picture of Andry Rajoelina is of very low-quality, and is not a good reflection of what he actually looks like: There has already been a discussion about it in the [Rajoelina's talk page], which led to the change of the photo for this one:

  

In addition to this, the legend of the picture is Andry Rajoelina seized power in 2009 whereas it should be Andry Rajoelina at an event related to the U.S. presidential election 2008 in the embassy of the U.S. in Antananarivo (source).

This photo and the legend should be changed right away: Right now, they express an anti-Rajoelina standpoint, and this doesn't resonate with Wikipedia NPOV.

Best, Thistrackted, t, March 26 2012 2:45

• Not done
  

1) Wikinews is not Wikipedia
2) Wikinews is a historical record, warts and all
Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)