Talk:Libya: Rebels edge closer to Tripoli
Review of revision 1276270 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1276270 of this article has been reviewed by Ragettho (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: There is a more recent news article developing here. Perhaps it would be a better idea to merge this article's content into the newer page. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1276270 of this article has been reviewed by Ragettho (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: There is a more recent news article developing here. Perhaps it would be a better idea to merge this article's content into the newer page. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- I totally understand why this failed. Reuters had updated their page and most of the information disappeared. I have changed the ref and that should do the trick, but, the page needs to be reviewed fast or, who knows, maybe the info will disappear from this ref too! Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1276495 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1276495 of this article has been reviewed by Ragettho (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Very nice The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1276495 of this article has been reviewed by Ragettho (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Very nice The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |