Talk:Jury considers Curt Dagenais court case

Revision 782322 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not ready: Fail Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Article should mention not just arguments exonerating Dagenais but arguments condemning him (e.g. expert testimony). Killing Vector (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 782322 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not ready: Fail Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Article should mention not just arguments exonerating Dagenais but arguments condemning him (e.g. expert testimony). Killing Vector (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

point of view

Tried to add more facts. The parts that were not in the first article were the points that were in contention. RCMP say this... Dagenais says that. Perhaps there can be help for this.Mandy (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision 782722 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 782722 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Quote templates

The templates for highlighting a quote, {{QuoteLeft}} and {{QuoteRight}} are supposed to be used with pull-quotes. That is, a quote which exists within the actual text of the article, and highlights a specific aspect of the story. They should not be used for a quote that is not within the article. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 10:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)