Talk:Jet flies 150 miles past destination in US; pilots say they were distracted
title fix to destination then space then in Seabanks (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The new title is problematic. Part of the investigation is looking at the possibility the pilots fell asleep; that is not forgetfulness. In fact, not knowing where you are and failure to respond is not forgetfulness either in the strictest sense of the word. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 16:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I changed it because I couldn't find "distracted" in any immediate sources; it may exist, but it doesn't seem readily apparent. Perhaps just "fail to land"? Sherurcij 16:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Both sources now on the article say so; the NTSB certainly use the exact word. What I'd really like is a title that makes note of the fact that this was a drama which unfolded over several hours. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 16:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I changed it because I couldn't find "distracted" in any immediate sources; it may exist, but it doesn't seem readily apparent. Perhaps just "fail to land"? Sherurcij 16:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Review of revision 901487 [Passed]
edit
Revision 901487 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I reverted back to the old title because it is more accurate. Otherwise, this article looks good to go, great job. -Tempodivalse [talk] 16:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 901487 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I reverted back to the old title because it is more accurate. Otherwise, this article looks good to go, great job. -Tempodivalse [talk] 16:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |