Talk:Japan earthquake shifts Earth's axis 10 centimetres
Review of revision 1194792 [Passed]
edit  |
Revision 1194792 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. I modified the quotes more than I usually would, but since they're already translated and not really exact to start with, I feel like there's more leeway to smoothen out the wording. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1194792 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. I modified the quotes more than I usually would, but since they're already translated and not really exact to start with, I feel like there's more leeway to smoothen out the wording. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- A quick IFL comes up with an English-language source citing 25 centimetres. — μ 22:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh crap. After more searching, I've got the BBC saying it might be 16 cm (no source cited, just a meteorologist's blog), USA Today says it's 6.5 in (that's a bit more than 10 cm, isn't it, and no source cited) and one of the sources in this article manages to contradict itself, it says in part 10 cm and later 25 inches, both from different guys. I'm not sure I want to trust that, given the translation, and the other source here definitely says 10 cm. C628 (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)