Talk:Jailed Swedish journalists tried as terrorists

Review of revision 1301082 [Not ready]

Revision 1301082 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Everything from "Ola Larsmo, writer and chairman..." onwards is unverifiable. I note you appear to have missed entering the URL of one source; perhaps the missing information is there? NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please take a look over the edits I made. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1301082 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Everything from "Ola Larsmo, writer and chairman..." onwards is unverifiable. I note you appear to have missed entering the URL of one source; perhaps the missing information is there? NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please take a look over the edits I made. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1304764 [Passed]

Revision 1304764 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I was unable to look at this earlier as I was away. Good work! One very major concern, however, arises; please be very careful that what you write is not copied from the sources - or even similar to the way it was written in the sources. It's a copyright violation and, whilst I very much doubt any newspaper would bother to sue you for it, it is actually illegal. An exception to this is Voice of America. They are in the public domain and can be copied from freely - but they are a propaganda arm, so be careful of subtle inherent bias. Nonetheless, I see no bias in this article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1304764 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I was unable to look at this earlier as I was away. Good work! One very major concern, however, arises; please be very careful that what you write is not copied from the sources - or even similar to the way it was written in the sources. It's a copyright violation and, whilst I very much doubt any newspaper would bother to sue you for it, it is actually illegal. An exception to this is Voice of America. They are in the public domain and can be copied from freely - but they are a propaganda arm, so be careful of subtle inherent bias. Nonetheless, I see no bias in this article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.