Talk:Iran, Turkey, Brazil reach nuclear agreement

Review of revision 1021683 [Passed]

Revision 1021683 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1021683 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Title confusing

Hi, The article currently says "Iran, Turkey, Brazil reach nuclear agreement" which seems to indicate that Brazil was involved in the deal in a way different from an impartial mediator. I think the page should be moved (renamed) to something like: "Iran and Turkey reach nuclear agreement" This is more clear and the mention of Brazil's involvement is already clear enough in the article.

Any objections?--Sampi (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Technically, Brazil played a major part in helping to reach this agreement. I don't think it's overly misleading after reading the article, though. —fetch·comms 07:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)