Talk:ICANN approves .xxx domain for pornography

Review of revision 1197801 [Failed]

Revision 1197801 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: The quote about how it "will add a measure of predicability" comes from ComputerWorld, not from ICANN. Or at least that's what the sources say. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Other than that, it's good to go. If that can be fixed, I'll approve it no problem. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1197801 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: The quote about how it "will add a measure of predicability" comes from ComputerWorld, not from ICANN. Or at least that's what the sources say. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Other than that, it's good to go. If that can be fixed, I'll approve it no problem. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1197863 [Passed]

Revision 1197863 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Problem solved! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1197863 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Problem solved! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Can I add the following articles as "Related news" to this article?

• New top-level domain names created 9 October 2010
• Egypt registers first domain name in Arabic 28 December 2009
• New top level domain approved 25 August 2009
• We'll always have .paris: ICANN votes for top level domain registration in 2009 23 February 2009
• U.S. retains control of Internet root servers 7 January 2009
• US rejects EU proposal to give Internet control to the UN 3 October 2008
• Adult-only TLD rejected by Internet body 28 January 2008
• ICANN rejects .xxx top-level domain name proposal 26 January 2008
• ICANN top-level .xxx domain name not dead yet 19 March 2007
• Egypt registers first domain name in Arabic 28 December 2009

I would like to add Category:ICANN to them but don't know how as they are archived. I have requested on the article talk pages. Mattisse (talk) 17:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

• Most of these are not directly related. However, feel free to add the three about the .xxx domain using {{Wikinews|title=|date=}} into a 'Related news' section. Archived articles need to be edited by admins, but anyone is free to request changes on the talk page. I'll get to these ones at some point; I don't know if you have or not, but for future reference there's a template to stick next to those requests - {{editprotected}}. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)