Talk:Google may shut down Chinese operations due to censorship and cyber attacks
Latest comment: 14 years ago by PSD27 in topic Merger
Merger
editThe article appears a duplicate of Google's "New Approach to China". Calebrw (talk) 06:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- I merged my article with this one, and in turn nominated my old one for speedy deletion. PSD27 (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Archive of Talk:Google's "New Approach to China"
editThis article appears to be a duplicate of Google may shut down Chinese operations due to censorship and cyber attacks. Calebrw (talk) 06:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but I was totally unaware of the article's development when I was writing mine above. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 15:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Same, but visa versa, I was not aware of the development of Patrick's article when I created mine. Since they're both seemingly equally valid articles, I guess the best solution would be just to merge the two. *Farts* PSD27 (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- I merged my article with Patrick's. Now this one can be deleted, and the other one published. PSD27 (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the articles contain the same info, but I think TUFKAAP's title is a little less POV IMO. Cocoaguytalkcontribs‽ 17:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- I merged my article with Patrick's. Now this one can be deleted, and the other one published. PSD27 (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Same, but visa versa, I was not aware of the development of Patrick's article when I created mine. Since they're both seemingly equally valid articles, I guess the best solution would be just to merge the two. *Farts* PSD27 (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 936613 [Passed]
edit
Revision 936613 of this article has been reviewed by Cocoaguy (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 936613 of this article has been reviewed by Cocoaguy (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |