Talk:French Open: Stosur and Schiavone to compete in women's final; Nadal to meet Soderling in men's final

Review of revision 1036518 [Failed]

Revision 1036518 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Sources not in correct order. Some sentences don't make complete sense. Title should be changed from "posed" to "poised". Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1036518 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Sources not in correct order. Some sentences don't make complete sense. Title should be changed from "posed" to "poised". Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1036953 [Passed]

Revision 1036953 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Massive genocide of articles for review: Good work! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1036953 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Massive genocide of articles for review: Good work! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Who cares about this kind of news, really? Benmyers31 (talk) 02:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)