Talk:Facebook hired PR firm to discredit Google, reveals leaked correspondence

Review of revision 1230639 [Passed]

Revision 1230639 of this article has been reviewed by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1230639 of this article has been reviewed by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Categories

{{edit protected}} Please add this article to Category:USA Today and update the wikilink to become local. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

If it belongs in Category:USA Today then presumably it also belongs in Category:Washington Post, since afaics they bear the same relation to the story; so I added both. --Pi zero (talk) 01:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)