Talk:Facebook blocked in Bangladesh
Viable news agency who has story lacking edit
Can only find lifedork.net icodebd blog archive, shamimasir blog and bdfact blogspot which has news of this story (Which I don't know if they are reliable enough - and most are blogs)....no reuters, bbc, associated press, etc. SriMesh | talk 19:22, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1031915 [Failed] edit
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1031915 [Failed] edit
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: As I said, try to expand on key topics in this article. That should help eliminate some of the bias that sometimes appears when you write a short, summarized account of a larger, much more complicated situation. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: As I said, try to expand on key topics in this article. That should help eliminate some of the bias that sometimes appears when you write a short, summarized account of a larger, much more complicated situation. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1032075 [Passed] edit
Revision 1032075 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1032075 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Sorry for the article being so poor before, I had to sleep, was too late ;) --Diego Grez return fire 13:42, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, yes. Sleep = Public enemy #1 Benny the mascot (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)