Talk:Facebook blocked in Bangladesh
Viable news agency who has story lacking
editCan only find lifedork.net icodebd blog archive, shamimasir blog and bdfact blogspot which has news of this story (Which I don't know if they are reliable enough - and most are blogs)....no reuters, bbc, associated press, etc. SriMesh | talk 19:22, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1031915 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1031915 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: As I said, try to expand on key topics in this article. That should help eliminate some of the bias that sometimes appears when you write a short, summarized account of a larger, much more complicated situation. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1031915 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: As I said, try to expand on key topics in this article. That should help eliminate some of the bias that sometimes appears when you write a short, summarized account of a larger, much more complicated situation. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1032075 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1032075 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1032075 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Sorry for the article being so poor before, I had to sleep, was too late ;) --Diego Grez return fire 13:42, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, yes. Sleep = Public enemy #1 Benny the mascot (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)