Talk:Engineer killed while working on travelator at London Waterloo station

Review of revision 4513681 [Not ready]

Revision 4513681 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: The lede of the article does not mention when the event happened. Also, minimal length requirement is at least three medium-sized paragraphs. One liners are not counted. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4513681 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: The lede of the article does not mention when the event happened. Also, minimal length requirement is at least three medium-sized paragraphs. One liners are not counted. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4514308 [Passed]

Revision 4514308 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Best not describe an 'unexplained' incident as an accident, which implies unintentional. No sure if he was meant to be repairing it; considered calling it maintenance, but wasn't strictly sure of that either, so went for the generic "working on" though avoiding use of the same phrase would have been nice. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4514308 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Best not describe an 'unexplained' incident as an accident, which implies unintentional. No sure if he was meant to be repairing it; considered calling it maintenance, but wasn't strictly sure of that either, so went for the generic "working on" though avoiding use of the same phrase would have been nice. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.