Talk:Emirates jet tail strikes runway during takeoff at Melbourne airport
Peer review
edit  |
Revision 789128 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Thankfully no body was hurt or sickened by the smoke. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 789128 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Thankfully no body was hurt or sickened by the smoke. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Newsworthy?
editI fail to see how this is newsworthy... Airliners are tested to be able to safely handle tailstrikes, and besides some dents and a messed up paint job, there is generally no danger or significant damage. There is no mention that there was in this case, and given the information in this article I do not think this is newsworthy. The only difference (in my opinion) between this and someone lightly damaging the rear bumper of a city bus in a fender-bender is that most people are extremely familiar with roads, but few know anything about aviation. Obviously there are newsworthy aviation incidents, and there have been an abnormally high number lately, but this is not one of them. Thanks, Falconus (talk) 01:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Category
edit{{edit protected}} Please add this article to Category:Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Green Giant (talk) 21:29, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Done --Pi zero (talk) 00:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
