Talk:Egypt protests: Army say they will not use force on demonstrators as Mubarak announces cabinet

Informal review

Revision reviewed: 1171540 BarkingFish (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

(Corrected from previous review, I missed the source of the Al Jazeera closure statement. BarkingFish (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC))

Some missing points

I'm not about to dedicate the time to either expand or review here, but if anybody would like to expand it here's some points that have happened since our last article:

• Vigilantes on the streets
• More appointments than just the Vice President; also, some background on that one. Military-linked figures now hold all the very top offices
• An updated death toll

BBC still reporting 100 wackywace 14:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

• Protests embraced by much of the military

Done

• Prison breakout

Done

• Funeral protests in Alexandria

Done

• International protests in support, e.g. in Iran and Amerika
• Army seems to be refusing any possible order to use live ammo

I've only skimmed over it - and certainly not attempted verification - but the article appears publishable as it stands. However, these points would create a more rounded coverage of the protests. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I've moved the article back to develop as I'm going to change the major subject of the article to fighter jets swooping low over Cairo and tanks moving into city centre. Should be ready to publish when finished. wackywace 14:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

POV

To paraphrase the BBC, "reform impies improvement, and is therefore inconsistent with our neutrality policy". — μ 08:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

• The title is insane. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1172818 [Passed]

Revision 1172818 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It is not stale. All seems okay. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1172818 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It is not stale. All seems okay. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.