Talk:Economist reports Saudi oil production can continue unabated

NPOV

Starting with the second paragraph, this article devolves into an editorial, essentially slamming the Economist's reporting in violation of WN:NPOV and WN:NOT. --+Deprifry+ 09:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I have reworked the language of the second paragraph, and removed the last (rather inflamatory, on second reading!) paragraph. What is left is fully cited - not POV, or at least, less POV than the referenced article in The Economist. Rosko 14:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Refrences

We are not an encyclopedia, inline links to references should not be used. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Duly noted, and progressively fixing in all articles I've worked on. Thanks for your help. Rosko 04:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, sorry I was a bit short. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 06:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)