Talk:Doha round negotiations might restart in a matter of weeks

Revision 694066 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 06:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: See Comments Comments by reviewer: While there is nothing wrong with the article as is, I feel that you need to toss in just a sentence or two explaining what the "Doha round negotiations" - someone reading this may not know (or have forgotten). --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 694066 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 06:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: See Comments Comments by reviewer: While there is nothing wrong with the article as is, I feel that you need to toss in just a sentence or two explaining what the "Doha round negotiations" - someone reading this may not know (or have forgotten). --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Ok fixed.--PatrickFlaherty (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Incomplete sentence

The WTO believes that a completed deal will restore confidence in the global economy and improve.

Improve what? --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry didn't catch that when I tried to proofread it. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Review 2

Revision 694442 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Perfect, thanks for your understanding. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 694442 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Perfect, thanks for your understanding. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Thanks for the review! I always forget that most people don't get excited at the mere mention of the Doha round like me. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 15:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)