Talk:Darcy Richardson suspends Democratic Party presidential campaign

Notes

• Correspondence with Darcy Richardson sent to scoop.--William S. Saturn (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Is there a reason it is not also reproduced here? Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
• William Saturn:

Darcy,

You're still in the race, right? Because someone wrote on Wikipedia that you told them via e-mail that you suspended your campaign.

• Darcy Richardson:

Hi William,

While my name will remain on the Texas primary ballot on May 29th and as an official write-in candidate in the June 5th California primary, I am not actively campaigning at this point and, for all practical purposes, have suspended my campaign. We've also taken my campaign web site off-line.

Thanks for asking.

In the meantime, I thought this article in today's Times-Picayune might be of some interest.

http://www.facebook.com/l/xAQE-idWsAQHdVxmffDMjHJsFg-jiMthye6kFKq4axiSyzQ/www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/04/president_obama_will_clinch_re.html

President Obama doesn't deserve to be unanimously re-nominated in Charlotte. When it happens — and I'm sure it will — it will be as fictitious as his fairy tale about an economic recovery.

With best wishes,

Darcy

Review of revision 1483686 [Passed]

Revision 1483686 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1483686 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.