Talk:Cricket World Cup 2015: New Zealand defeats Afghanistan by six wickets in Napier

Review of revision 3294947 [Not ready]

Revision 3294947 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: In addition to the material already removed, I'm having huge difficulty verifying who scored how many runs, who took how many wickets, and that the Afghans are out (though it seems very likely they are; possibly if I had more knowledge of the tournament's format I could verify this). NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3294947 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: In addition to the material already removed, I'm having huge difficulty verifying who scored how many runs, who took how many wickets, and that the Afghans are out (though it seems very likely they are; possibly if I had more knowledge of the tournament's format I could verify this). NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Hi, I am trying to integrate the match score-card but not successful. Kindly help me with it, the scorecard is concisely put up here. Moreover, I have provided adequate reference for Afghanistan being knocked out of the tournament. Abhinav619 (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not review articles like we do, so they are not a suitable source. As for Afghan elimination, it's very possible you did, but as I've already said I could not track that fact down so I'm going to need a little help finding where in the sources it comes from. My gut feeling is played 5, lost 4 should in its own right prove they are out but I don't know enough about the tournament to be positive. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 12:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC) I realise now you meant that you added a new source. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 12:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Review of revision 3298122 [Passed]

Revision 3298122 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Relatively easy to pass this with the extra source; however, just on the cusp of going stale. We've very few sports-savvy reviewers, so this is an area where — given the statistical complexity of sports like cricket — helping notes on the talk page are likely to aid in getting through review more-quickly. As is having a break for tea, then double-checking you've sourced every detail, before hitting "submit". The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3298122 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Relatively easy to pass this with the extra source; however, just on the cusp of going stale. We've very few sports-savvy reviewers, so this is an area where — given the statistical complexity of sports like cricket — helping notes on the talk page are likely to aid in getting through review more-quickly. As is having a break for tea, then double-checking you've sourced every detail, before hitting "submit". The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.