Talk:Court ruling upholds TikTok ban unless ByteDance sells stake

AI-generated content

We have no policy for or against using AI-generated content. We have the following proposed guideline: WN:AI.

Was this article written with the help of AI? —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 23:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

No use of AI in the writing of this article.

Still under development

@Lofi Gurl: is this article meant to be reviewed now or is it still under development? There are edits being made while it is under review and our edits are colliding. While articles are under review, they should not be edited except by the reviewer.

If you are still developing the article, I will move it back to the developing queue and step away until you are ready. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 23:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, was just making last minute changes. I'm done making editing this article until post-review Lofi Gurl (talk) 23:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Review of revision 4807972 [Passed]

Revision 4807972 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Be sure to write articles in the past tense, per WN:TENSE, part of our style guide. Also be careful with "scuffing" phrases from original sources. At times this article read very similarly to the source articles. See the following for more about scuffing: Wikinews:Tips_on_reviewing_articles#Copyvio. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4807972 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Be sure to write articles in the past tense, per WN:TENSE, part of our style guide. Also be careful with "scuffing" phrases from original sources. At times this article read very similarly to the source articles. See the following for more about scuffing: Wikinews:Tips_on_reviewing_articles#Copyvio. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

ya I honestly struggled coming up with original ways to recount the source content, the first few sentences especially. any advice? Lofi Gurl (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Sometimes AI can help. ツ Another idea is to work through simple answers to the WN:5W&H and then flesh out those simple answers.

Reviewers often use Earwig's Copyvio Detector to check for similarities. Authors can certainly do the same. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 00:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)