Talk:Chip and PIN 'not fit for purpose', says Cambridge researcher

This happened on Thursday... — μ 18:08, February 13 2010 (UTC)

International Audience

As a U.S. reader, I don't understand if this effects me or not. Is this system just in the UK? Calebrw (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I see now that the paper does mention the U.S. I believe this should be included. Calebrw (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 957923 [Passed]

Revision 957923 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 957923 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Invalid POS picture description

There is invalid description for POS picture, it claims to show "vunerable terminal", although POS terminal is the last and the least from flawed systems list. The flaw is on the whole system design, while terminal was just used for demonstration. Grain (talk) 01:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC) ut {{editprotected}}

Under demonstrated vulnerability, transaction inconsistency were totally missed by all participated computer systems, including smart card (computer system owned by issuer bank), bank's backend servers, and least, a POS terminal.

Original (deceiving) description:

An EMV terminal, similar to those found to be vulnerable.

Suggested (correct) description:

An EMV terminal, similar to those used in the system vulnerability demonstration.

Please correct my English, if there are errors. Grain (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

• The article is already published and archived, such changes can't be done now. Yell at the person who published this piece of c**p :P Diego Grez ^{return fire} 01:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)