Talk:China plans to ban smoking in indoor public places

Review of revision 1201145 [Failed]

Revision 1201145 of this article has been reviewed by Cartman02au (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 02:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: this statement is obviously incorrect - "China, with more than 300 smokers, is the largest cigarette market in the world." NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1201145 of this article has been reviewed by Cartman02au (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 02:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: this statement is obviously incorrect - "China, with more than 300 smokers, is the largest cigarette market in the world." NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

It is true that there are more than 300 - but an understatement, to say the least. :) Was "million" meant? Tempodivalse [talk] 03:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1201439 [Failed]

Revision 1201439 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 10:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "The World Health Organisation says Chinese smoking-related deaths account for one fifth of deaths from smoking world-wide" is not verified in the sources. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: After this fix it can be published. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1201439 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 10:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "The World Health Organisation says Chinese smoking-related deaths account for one fifth of deaths from smoking world-wide" is not verified in the sources. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: After this fix it can be published. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1201472 [Passed]

Revision 1201472 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good now. Thanks for the message on my talk page. If it was in the others I must have read over the 20%. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1201472 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good now. Thanks for the message on my talk page. If it was in the others I must have read over the 20%. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.